11/20/2023 0 Comments Topaz video enhance ai gaia vs artemis![]() # adjusting output color from: RGB48 to YUV420P8 for x264ModelĬlip = (clip=clip, format=vs.YUV420P8, matrix_s="470bg", range_s="limited")Ĭlip = (clip=clip, fpsnum=24000, fpsden=1001) # adjusting color space from YUV420P8 to RGBS for VsSwinIRĬlip = (clip=clip, format=vs.RGBS, matrix_in_s="470bg", range_s="limited")Ĭlip = SwinIR(clip=clip, task="real_sr_large", scale=4, tile_x=352, tile_y=240, tile_pad=16, device_type="cuda", device_index=0) # 2816x1920Ĭlip = (clip=clip, w=1920, h=1474, kernel="lanczos", interlaced=False, interlacedd=False) # DEBUG: vsTIVTC changed scanorder to: progressiveĬlip = (clip=clip, left=8, right=8, top=0, bottom=0) # make sure content is preceived as frame based # Setting color range to TV (limited) range.Ĭlip = (clip=clip, prop="_ColorRange", intval=1)Ĭlip = (clip=clip)# new fps: 23.976 # making sure input color matrix is set as 470bgĬlip = (clip, matrix_in_s="470bg",range_s="limited")Ĭlip = (clip=clip, fpsnum=30000, fpsden=1001) # current color space: YUV420P8, bit depth: 8, resolution: 720x480, fps: 29.97, color matrix: 470bg, yuv luminance scale: limited, scanorder: telecine You can, of has already tested it, we're discussing it here:Ĭ(path="I:/Hybrid/64bit/vsfilters/Support/fmtconv.dll")Ĭ(path="I:/Hybrid/64bit/vsfilters/DeinterlaceFilter/TIVTC/libtivtc.dll")Ĭ(path="I:/Hybrid/64bit/vsfilters/SourceFilter/d2vSource/d2vsource.dll") I do not have VapourSynth installed, so please allow some time for me to get familiar with it. Oh and for interlaced content I use bwdif because qtgmc makes the image look like a waxpainting. Both of these things Artemis can do much better.Īnd personally, I'd save topaz output to prores (and use ffmpeg with more control for final encode) The same is true for sharpening (as long as your source is not too soft). Furthermore, all AI models do denoising, so denoising with avisynth is pointless (will destroy too much fine detail if denoised twice). I used it just as an upscaler after the excellent avisynth denoise + sharpening, so Topaz VEAI takes advantage of the avisynth restoration otherwise in my case is not even worth of consideration!Īs I already said, people should use Artemis because it is the fasted and most tuned model. Haven’t look too much into that, though, as I always use 200x (either 720p to 1440p or 1080p to 4k).Personally, on my s-vhs captures I experimented that it is not any better than a full AviSynth restoration + upscale flow: If I’m correct it works best like that when using gigapixel, and the algorythm should be the same for VEAI. Also, depending on the resolution of the source and your taget resolution, MAYBE it is best to do the upscaling in steps, like from 480p to 1080p, then 4k (if you want to upscale SD material to UHD). But I always use HQ (now Gaia-HQ) as it’s the one with better results by my judgement and using my videos, it can be different with your videos and taste. ![]() What preset you use (Gaia or Artemis) probably depends on what your source material is, so there’s not a ‘recommended setting’. If one thing can be said, though, is that some users have better final results if first only using the 100% denoise/deblock and then upscaling, but that can take up to double the time compared to if you only upscale, more like using a second-pass while encoding video, so you should think what’s better. I had to rollback from 1.2 to 1.1 (1.2 was taking way too long to encode), but in 1.2 using 100% or 200% in resource priority wouldn’t change anything, and anything more than that would result in either the same or crashes. You can choose what preset (Gaia-HQ ,Gaia-CG, and the Artemis flavours, but artemis still looks like garbage for most cases) it will use and that’s pretty much it. To be fair, as of now, we don’t have much settings to go.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |