11/21/2023 0 Comments Rightfont reviewPrhartcom ( talk) 00:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC) Reply Done. Refer to the consensus in the discussion here: Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations#RfC: Change wording of last Immediate failure in the GA Criteria Thank you. It has issues noted in a previous GA review that still have not been adequately addressed, as determined by a reviewer who has not previously reviewed the article Change from:Ī reviewer who has not previously reviewed the article determines that any issues from previous GA nominations have not been adequately considered ![]() This request is to make a wording change of the 5th line down, "0e" in the Quick fail section. It is used solely to display the policy of the Good Article Criteria on this one page: Wikipedia:Good article criteria The existing template is: Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC – Fayenatic London 03:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC) Reply As an aid to maintenance I have scruffily added them above the box. 13:53, 30 July 2023 (UTC) Reply Thanks, nice work Pppery! Is it worth also incorporating the new categories into the top of the list at Template:Userspace drafts progress? – Fayenatic London 00:51, 31 July 2023 (UTC) Reply In theory yes, but in practice it's not a project I feel like taking on. – Fayenatic London 09:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC) Reply Done * Pppery * it has begun. The task would benefit from expert attention. ![]() I also tested the template on my sandbox and here is the result. I've also tested overriding this template here and it works fine… 89.85.240.224 ( talk) 20:57, 24 July 2023 (UTC) Reply While waiting for answers regarding my template, I added parameters myself to make the text more understandable. Here is its draft with its documentation page… This template allows for a second user to create ineligible pages.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |